WebMr. Bairstow was a Director of a company manufacturing leather.Mr. Harrison was an employee of a spinning firm. Neither of themhad had any transactions in machinery or … WebHMRC v Pendragon [2015] 1 WLR 2838 ([2015] UKSC 37) per Lord Carnwath at paras 44-51. However, HMRC dispute the broader challenge to the FTT’s findings of fact on Edwards v Bairstow grounds. It will be necessary to consider the extent to which the UT can and should enter into a reconsideration of the facts in this case.
1962 CanLII 55 (SCC) Irrigation Industries Ltd. v. The Minister of ...
WebViscount Radcliffe's ingenious explanation in Edwards v. Bairstow [1956] AC 14 of irrationality as a ground for a court's reversal of a decision by ascribing it to an inferred though unidentifiable mistake of law by the decision-maker. “Irrationality” by now can stand upon its own feet as an accepted ground on which a decision WebEdwards v Bairstow [1956] AC 14: The classic case on review of decisions applying the law. Bairstow seized an opportunity to buy a spinning plant at the low price of £12,000; … gigabit unlicensed microwave radios
CAN YOU SEE THE JUDGE’S CASE NOTES? - Julian Hickey
WebThe general principles were established in Edwards v Bairstow (1956) AC 14. 43 43. See particularly Atiyah, Vicarious Liability in the Law of Torts (1967) Ch 2. See also Glanville Williams ‘Vicarious Liability and the Master's Indemnity’ (1957) 20 MLR 220 and Baty Vicarious Liability (1916). 44 44. WebMay 15, 2024 · [1956] AC 14, [1955] 3 All ER 48, [1955] 36 Tax Cas 207, [1955] UKHL 3, [1955] UKHL TC – 36 – 207, 36 TC 207. Links: Bailii, Bailii. Jurisdiction: England and … WebJul 24, 2012 · Edwards v. Bairstow [1956] AC 14 (refd) Harpers Trading (M) Sdn Bhd v. National Union of Commercial Workers [1991] 2 CLJ 881; [1991] 1 CLJ (Rep) 159 SC (refd) Kerajaan Malaysia & Ors v. Nasharuddin Nasir [2004] 1 CLJ 81 FC (refd) Lee Eng Teh & Ors v. Teh Thiang Seong & Anor [1966] 1 LNS 79 HC (refd) Minister of Home Affairs, … gigabit tp link router